The Grey (2012)

Rated: R

Genre: Action/Survival/Drama

Info: IMDb

Directed By: Joe Carnahan

Starring: Liam Neeson, Dermot Mulroney, Frank Grillo

“The Grey” is the gripping tale of Ottway (Neeson), a stone faced hunter hired by an oil company to kill wolves and protect workers in a remote region of Alaska. In the beginning of the movie we see that Ottway no longer wishes to live and almost takes his own life. As fate would have it, his plane ride home crashes and it becomes his job to ensure the survival of those who did not die in the crash. What follows is a harrowing story of survival in which Ottway must struggle with both his inner demons and those roaming the woods around him.

I noticed a lot of people at the theatre had mixed feelings about this movie. Predictably, today’s ADD generation of movie goers were delighted during the action parts, but just could not handle the suspense or story. I, however, enjoyed this movie. Survival stories are slowly beginning to pop their head into entertainment with shows like “I survived” and “I shouldn’t be alive” and movies such as “127 hours”. This story is one that will keep you rooting for the survivors as they move inches towards civilization and eventual rescue.

The survivors are faced with some pretty rough hardships. The freezing cold and weather conditions. Starvation. Injuries. And worst of all, their plane crashed right in the middle of wolf hunting territory. Neeson and his gang of survivors are viciously hunted by weirdly large and aggressive CGI wolves (the viciousness of these wolves being the most Hollywood-esque aspect of the entire film). One by one, the survivors are picked off, either by the elements or by the wolves. No two guys really die the same, which was pretty cool. Also, each survivor is sculpted out and given unique characteristics and back stories, which separates this movie from a horror movie where people hardly even have names. You find yourself getting attached to certain characters and then being a bit upset when they bite it.

I enjoyed watching Neeson’s character do all that he can to stay alive, even though he is proven to be suicidal, just so that he can get the other survivors home to their families. The struggle that he goes through seems a bit too real, which ropes you into the film. The ending of the movie seems to be what some people were bothered by the most, but I felt that it was very fitting and satisfying.he highlight of this movie for me was the plane crash, which is so surreal, it’s scary. Also, there is a little tid-bit after the credits, but nothing really worth staying for.

4 out of 5 Knocks

Limitless (2011)

Rated: PG-13

Genre: Thriller/Sci-Fi/Mystery

Info: Official Website

Directed By: Neil Burger

Starring: Bradley Cooper, Robert De Niro, Abbie Cornish

To be fair and just, I had no desire whatsoever to see this movie. It was between this and The Green Lantern. I wanted to see The Green Lantern, but due to circumstances, I ended up settling with Limitless. Boy, am I glad I made that decision!

Limitless follows Eddie Morra (Bradley Cooper), a struggling, unkempt writer. Eddie’s girlfriend (Abbie Cornish) leaves him, and he is having difficulty completing (or even starting) his novel. He runs into his ex-wife’s brother, Vernon, who also happens to be Eddie’s ex-drug dealer, on the streets of NYC. The two decide to sit down for a drink, and, during their conversation, Vernon offers him a small, clear pill, called NTZ. He tells Eddie that this pill will allow him to access 100% of his brain, as opposed to the 10% that human beings naturally access. Eddie brings the pill home with him and tries it out, and, within thirty seconds, everything becomes clear to him. He is even able to complete his book because of his new-found knowledge and enthusiasm.

NTZ allows Eddie to tap into his subconscious mind and recover knowledge that he doesn’t even realize he has. The next day, however, he is back to his old self. He is already addicted to the effects of the drug, and quickly seeks out more drugs from Vernon. He finds that Vernon has been brutally murdered by someone who was searching for the NTZ, but did not find his stash. Eddie searches for and finds the stash of NTZ, a discovery that will forever alter his life. He begins regularly taking the pills, and soon finds that he is wildly popular, rich, successful, and a genius (among many other things).

The pills do not come without consequences, as  Eddie soon finds out. Side effects of the drug include blackouts, loss of time, sickness, and death. (Some pretty serious side effects, if you ask me). Top that off with the fact that there are other NTZ addicts whose stashes are running low since the death of Vernon, and you have one wildly entertaining story.

Upon doing some research on the movie, I found that Shia LaBeouf was originally cast as Eddie. Though LaBeouf is a decent actor, I am personally relieved that he did not play this role. Nothing against Shia, but Bradley Cooper really knocked this out of the park. His transformation from an unclean, indie writer-to a successful, intellectual genius-and then to a drug addicted freak of nature, is portrayed with great precision and excellency. His character is executed brilliantly and, most importantly, believably. Robert De Niro steps in as a season veteran to add something special to this flick. He portrays a Trump-esque businessman whom employs Eddie, for his genius ability to play the stock market. De Niro is exceptional and stern, and gives the movie a sense of urgency on a business end, which couples excellently with Eddie’s situation (and the fact that people are trying to kill him).

The aspect of this movie that stood out the most was the cinematography. Flawless. Inventive. Perfect. These words do nothing to describe the way this movie looks, and the way the camera moves. The cinematography is creative and intelligent. When Eddie is on the drug NTZ, the picture turns from a cool, depressing blue to a bright, soft tone. It becomes very crisp, as if we as the viewers are actually experiencing the effect of this drug. The entire feel of the movie is perfected through Neil Burger’s direction and through Jo Willems’ cinematography. One, if not both, of these men deserve an Academy Award for this movie.

In addition to a fantastic story, great acting, and amazing visuals, the movie ends with an underlying theme. This political theme revolves around lobbyist groups controlling politicians, and is slipped into the movie quickly and almost without notice. It parallels the theme of drug use for personal gain with great effect.

If you haven’t seen Limitless, then you are missing out.

5 Knocks out of 5

 

 

The Facebook Movie: “The Social Network” (2010)

Rated: R

Genre: Drama

Info: Official Website

Directed By: David Fincher

Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield, Justin Timberlake

 

I’m calling this the Facebook movie because that is what it is. Lets get it right out there, I am not quite sure what all the hype and Oscar buzz is about this film. I was reluctant to watch it but I waited until it came out on DVD and I Netflixed.

This is apparently the true account of how Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg came up with the idea for the social site. There were a lot of rumors circulating that he stole the idea and that is how it was portrayed in the film. Whether or not you agree that he actually took the idea and created it or he took a simple idea and transformed it into something better is up to you.

So the film started off with Zuckerberg on a date and he’s talking a mile a minute and it’s hard to follow a little bit. He comes across arrogant, smug and just socially awkward, ironic I know. I didn’t care for his character at all, as a matter of fact he was down right unlikable. I know that was the point and I get it, job well done Sorkin. The first half of the film I didn’t enjoy at all, I felt that it couldn’t be more cliche and stereotypical and have the rest of the world hate the Harvard community even more. Cue Justin Timberlake.

In the sense that he helped elevate Facebook he does so with this film. His character made everything more interesting and took some of the focus off of Zuckerberg at this point which was a relief, I just couldn’t take much more of his ramblings. The story starts to expand rapidly, as does the site itself. Without giving too many spoilers to the film for those 3 of you that didn’t see it, I’ll refrain from going into too much depth from here on out.

The story itself was good, the characters were good and the acting was right on the money. Jesse Eisenberg REALLY makes me not like Zuckerberg. Timberlake was a breath of fresh air and that really made the second half of the film move a lot quicker and more smoothly. By the end of the film I really wanted to start my own type of site and have 500 million people logging in on a daily basis. I suppose the sign of a good film is if it moves you emotionally, well this moved me intellectually, so what does that say about the film? Or me?

I’d recommend that you watch this film, especially if you have a Facebook account…and even if you don’t. You may like it, you may not but you will be entertained. Does it deserve “Best Picture”? Mmmm, probably not but when did any of us agree with what the Academy selects? I think there are stronger pictures on the board this year, but that’s a whole different blog.

3.5 Knocks out of 5

 

The Fighter

 

Rated: R

Genre: Drama/Sports

Info: Official Website

Directed By: David O. Russell

Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Christian Bale, Amy Adams

I waited a little for the hype of this film to die down before I actually went out to see it. I caught this just short of it being nominated for the Golden Globes and today we see it’s one of the heaviest nominated films of the Academy Awards. Rightfully so.

I really enjoy watching movies like this, I really do. I have to say that I was like a kid on Christmas morning knowing this was coming out so you can imagine the anticipation I had while I waited a few weeks after it came out. Needless to say it was well worth the wait. Movies like this and Rudy, Brian’s Song, Miracle, the really great ‘feel good’ stories out there are the prime reason for my jump into the industry. This film will remembered forever and one of those that you can watch over and over for multiple reasons.

Reason 1: Christian Bale: what a knock-dead performance! I love when an actor submerges himself so far into the character that his physical appearance becomes that character! It was hard to believe we were watching “Batman” playing a crack addict. Amazing amazing job Mr. Bale, this almost makes us forget your tirade on the set of T4…but that was just as entertaining.

Reason 2: Lowell Mass: I’ve been there, a friend of mine used to live there and I’d visit from time to time. It’s not a great area, it’s usually dressed as it was seen with druggies, low rent and just bad influence. But this town has character, it was a central character and an important character for this film. You are submerged into this town and by the end you feel as if you’ve actually lived there. The town’s people have character and it is those people that we can identify with no matter what our background. These are REAL people fighting the fight each and everyday! Bravo Lowell! Bravo! You played it well.

Reason 3: The Story: I was a tad bit disappointed that this didn’t touch up on ANY of the fights Ward had with Gatti but after thinking about it for a little while I realized that that wouldn’t have made for a great film. Sure it would have been exciting but we as an audience want to see the fight, the struggle to the top and bask in the joy of being there when you come from nothing. It’s the Rudy, the Miracle story that gets your attention!

Reason 4: Amy Adams: We all know someone like this. Someone who had the aspirations to venture out and eject them self from where they come from. By that I mean she attempted to go to college, get an education but she really just was one in the same. Adams played this beautifully, and even packing on a few pounds. She was the encouragement, the rock for Ward and when he wanted to give up she stepped in his corner for support. As I said, we all know someone like that.

Reason 5: Mark Wahlberg: Kudos for fighting for this film for 4 years. You done well.

So it’s easy to see why this picture was nominated for 7 Academy Awards and it’s easier to see why everyone is going out to watch it.  So I say to you, go see this film whether your fan of acting, seeing great performances, boxing, great stories, you’re going to love it regardless.

5 Knocks out of 5

2011 Academy Awards Are In…Our Predictions

So the highly anticipated, most coveted award show for the motion picture industry released their nominations for this years Academy Awards this morning. This seems to be an exciting time of year for all the filmmakers and most of the majors that are pining for their pictures to get some free publicity. We at KNOCKERS love to see what the industry turns out to consider some of the best work put out that year.

Here is the list of nominations and our own predictions on the top categories.

BEST PICTURE

Black Swan – Mike Medavoy, Brian Oliver and Scott Franklin – PRODUCERS

The Fighter – David Hoberman, Todd Lieberman and Mark Wahlberg – PRODUCERS

Inception – Emma Thomas and Christopher Nolan – PRODUCERS

The Kids Are Alright – Gary Gilbert, Jeffrey Levy-Hinte and Celine Rattray – PRODUCERS

The King’s Speech – Iain Canning, Emile Sherman and Gareth Unwin – PRODUCERS

127 Hours – Christian Colson, Danny Boyle and John Smithson – PRODUCERS

The Social Network – Scott Rudin, Dana Brunetti, Michael De Luca and Ceán Chaffin – PRODUCERS

Toy Story 3 – Darla K. Anderson – PRODUCER

True Grit – Scott Rudin, Ethan Coen and Joel Coen – PRODUCERS

Winter’s Bone – Anne Rosellini and Alix Madigan-Yorkin – PRODUCERS

ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE

James Franco – 127 Hours

Jeff Bridges – True Grit

Javier Bardem – Biutiful

Jesse Eisenberg – The Social Network

Colin Firth – The King’s Speech

ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE

Christian Bale – The Fighter

Jeremy Renner – The Town

John Hawkes –  Winter’s Bone

Mark Ruffalo –  The Kids Are Alright

Geoffrey Rush – The King’s Speech

ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE

Annette Bening – The Kids Are Alright

Nicole Kidman – Rabbit Hole

Jennifer Lawrence – Winter’s Bone

Natalie Portman – Black Swan

Michelle Williams  – Blue Valentine

ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE

Amy Adams  – The Fighter

Helena Bonham Carter – The King’s Speech

Melissa Leo – The Fighter

Hailee Steinfeld –  True Grit

Jacki Weaver – Animal Kingdom

DIRECTION

Darren Aronofsky – Black Swan

David O. Russell – The Fighter

Tom Hopper – The King’s Speech

David Fincher – The Social Network

Joel Coen and Ethan Coen – True Grit

To see the complete list of nominations: 2011 Academy Award Nominations

Black Swan (2010)

Rated: R

Genre: Drama/Thriller

Info: Official Website

Directed By: Darren Aronofsky

Starring: Natalie Portman, Mila Kunis, Vincent Cassel

If you are looking for a movie that will make you feel uncomfortable, while simultaneously confusing you and grossing you out, then look no further.

“Black Swan” is the story of Nina Sayers (Natalie Portman), a sheltered and determined ballerina. The story revolves around the ballet “Swan Lake”, with Sayers landing the lead role of “Swan Queen”. Sayers’ ballet teacher, Thomas Leroy (Vincent Cassel) is cold, brilliant and sexual, and has one goal in mind: To put on an entirely original and groundbreaking performance of “Swan Lake”. To do so, he fires his lead role (Winona Ryder), and replaces her with Sayers. Ryder is not too thrilled, and winds up in the hospital with horrific self-inflicted injuries. This is just a glimpse of what is in store for Sayers.

Sayers’ home life leaves much to be desired. She lives with her mother, Erica Sayers (Barbara Hershey), who ended her career as a ballerina due to her being pregnant with Nina. She now lives vicariously and obsessively through her daughter, passively blaming her for never landing a lead role herself. Nina does not seem to have any friends, or much of a personality. All she knows is ballet. She definitely doesn’t lack in the discipline department. We see that Nina tortures herself for her craft. She deforms her body to suit that of a professional ballerina, years in the making. Her feet are crunched into tiny ballet slippers, she is too slender and bony. We also catch a glimpse of an obsessive scratching/picking habit, addressed by her mother. As the story unfolds, strange happenings occur. Nina begins to see a doppleganger, and suffer from hallucinations. It is not long before the movie begins to feel like Adrian Lyne’s “Jacob’s Ladder”.

Aspects of this movie which seem to be the most important are what you will be questioning the entire length of the film. The most horrific thing about the entire story is the realization that it is very probable that real-life ballerinas treat themselves as portrayed in “Black Swan”. Where as Natalie Portman’s character obviously has a history of mental illness (perhaps opened widely by the pressure brought on by a lead role, her mother, and her teacher’s insistence that she release her darker side in order to better fit the part of the black swan), it is still a very realistic tale. It is important to walk away from this movie knowing that the main character was obsessive to the point where her own mental and physical health no longer mattered, as long as she succeeded in her career. She is far too worried about being “perfect” and “beautiful”, that she overpasses all warning signs that she is harming herself.

All in all, if you try to figure out what is going on in “Black Swan”, you might be disappointed. However, if you are able to see what is right in front of you on the screen, and understand the story, you will thoroughly enjoy it. There is some neat camera work, a lot of tastefully erotic scenes, and a great classical soundtrack (a backwards rendition of the music from “Swan Lake”). I would not be surprised if the movie is nominated for multiple Oscars®, including a win for Portman in the “Best Actress” category.

4.5 Knocks out of 5

Due Date (2010)

 

Rated: R

Genre: Comedy

Info: Official Website

Directed By: Todd Phillips

Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Zach Galifianakis, Michelle Monaghan

Go see “Due Date”. Period.

If that wasn’t enough to convince you to head out to your local theater, then here’s a review:

“Due Date” follows successful architect, Peter Highman (Downey Jr.), as he attempts to travel across the United States, and arrive on time to witness the birth of his first child. Plans fail from the get-go, due to aspiring actor Ethan Tremblay (Galifianakis). After a brief run in, Highman and Tremblay accidentally switch luggage at the airport. Highman is questioned by security after they find a marijuana pipe in his bag. The bag is confiscated, and he is allowed clearance onto the plane. Tremblay is moved from economy class to first class, positioning him directly behind Highman. Highman, wanting nothing to do with Tremblay, attempts to keep to himself. These efforts are unsuccessful, and soon lead to an argument between the two men. The argument ends when Highman is shot with a rubber bullet by an air marshal, and both men are put on the “Do Not Fly” list.

Having lost his wallet in the luggage that is still on the plane, Highman is left with no other option than to hitch a ride with Tremblay, who has rented a vehicle. Hilarity ensues.

The combination of Todd Phillips and Zach Galifianakis have done it again, this time with a road film. Take the magic formula: Oddball Galifianakis; straight laced Robert Downey Jr.; multiple angles of a French bulldog; constant drug use; and one difficult journey. You’re looking at the perfect comedy. Downey Jr.’s character is a bit of a prick, but understandably, as Galifianakis almost gets the two of them killed multiple times. Galifianakis, on the other hand, is a lovable loser. He is traveling to Los Angelos to become an actor, and on the way, he plans to spread his father’s ashes (which he keeps in a coffee can).

So, take this perfect comedic formula, and add the following instances: Robert Downey Jr. punching an annoying child in the stomach; Galifianakis masturbating in the car, while Robert Downey Jr. yells at him; both men accidentally driving through the Mexican border with narcotics in their vehicle; Jamie Foxx accidentally making cups of coffee out of Galifianakis’ father’s ashes (and the three men drinking them); and many, MANY more.

Now, keeping these formula and instances in mind, and add a human aspect. Galifianakis dupes Downey Jr. into traveling with him, simply because he does not want to be alone. The death of his father is an underlying theme for the entire movie, yet it is not too deeply explored, in order to keep the comedy flowing. There are notable parts that tug at your heartstrings: Galifiankis in “actor-mode”, pretending to be on the phone with an imaginary wife, who is divorcing him; and the spreading of his father’s ashes. These scenes are saddening, but are very welcome in this film, because they are necessary and effective.

The casting was spot on. Perfect. This comedy duo cannot be replicated. The writing and dialogue is clever and witty, and the actors’ delivery on every line is flawless. Not a single moment of this movie drags, the screen will hold your attention the entire way through. “Due Date” is the must-see comedy of the year!

Convinced? Go see this movie.

5 Knocks out of 5

Toy Story 3 (2010)

Rated: G

Genre: Animation/Comedy/Adventure

Info: IMDb

Directed By: Lee Unkrich

Starring: Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, Joan Cusack, Michael Keaton

The third and final(?) installment to the Toy Story series is a smash hit, a cinematic masterpiece of animation. Our favorite articulated heroes Woody the cowboy (Tom Hanks) and Buzz Lightyear  the spaceman (Tim Allen) return to the big screen, accompanied by their pleasantly familiar toy posse (including Mr. and Mrs. Potato-Head, Rex, Slinky the Dog, and many more). Their owner, Andy, is no longer a child. He is a semi-mature 17 year old, heading off to his freshman year of college. He has long since forgotten about his playthings. So begins the story.

Having sat in a toy chest for an unknown amount of time, our heroes are at a crossroads. They will either be stored in the attic, or they will be shipped off to daycare. Through a mishap, they take the daycare route. Final destination: Sunnyside Daycare, a place that seems too good to be true… and it is. Run by a bittersweet and psychopathic teddy bear named Lotso (voiced by Ned Beatty), this daycare is split into two halves: The toddlers and the infants. The toddlers happily play with their lucky toys, and the infants torture them without mercy. Our protagonists are stuck with the infants. Thanks a lot, Lotso. It is now up to Woody to save his friends.

This movie appeals to everyone: young children who are unfamiliar or recently enlightened to the series; those in their late teens or early twenties who grew up loving these characters; and adults (parents or otherwise), who enjoy great laughs and adventure. The best part about this movie is the fact that, though it’s geared towards a younger generation, it is not at all childish. In fact, there are some deeply serious moments of great drama included in the story.

Toy Story 3 gives us the closure that we have hoped for. It takes us through a wild and crazy adventure, and teaches us about the magic of friendship and determination. It also makes us laugh and shake our heads (Michael Keaton voicing a “Ken Doll” is a laugh riot!)

I recommend this movie for everyone. If you have not yet seen it, you need to. It is so close to perfection, it’s almost scary.

4.5 Knocks out of 5

Grown Ups (2010)

Rated: PG-13

Genre: Comedy

Info: Official Website

Starring: Adam Sandler, Kevin James, Chris Rock

Directed By: Dennis Dugan

With the death of their childhood basketball coach, five friends reunite for a Fourth of July weekend. With them, they bring their wives, children, and nannies. Hilarity ensues…sort of.

Adam Sandler leads this star studded cast as Lenny Feder, Hollywood’s #1 agent. He has two spoiled sons and a daughter with his wife Roxanne (Selma Hayek). Lenny keeps his lifestyle semi-hidden from the rest of his friends, which include: Eric Lamonsoff (Kevin James), an unemployed family man; Kurt McKenzie (Chris Rock), a whipped husband to a pregnant wife; Marcus Higgins (David Spade), a drunken bachelor; and Rob Hilliard (Rob Schneider), a guru outcast.

Many a time, this movie tries hard to be funny. The writing is a mixture of Adam Sandler and SNL writer Fred Wolf, and is more an attempt at snappy one-liners than it is a comic masterpiece. Many of these one-liners work, but many fall flat and leave much to be desired. Most of the dialogue involves one or more characters insulting another, giving the appearance of complete comic improv. This would be a genius idea, if it could somehow avoid becoming redundant and somewhat annoying.

The PG-13 rating becomes known all too well, as language and nudity is cut down to “Shiznit” and bikini teasing. It’s a nice way to have this film appeal to children and families, but it is a turn off for any adult who appreciates normal, everyday speech. Perhaps Grown Ups is too “family friendly”, especially for Sandler fans, who long for the days of “Happy Gilmore” and “Billy Madison”, and dread the days of “Bedtime Stories” and “Funny People”. Point in case, Adam Sandler may be losing his magic. It’s a good thing he had heavy hitters Kevin James and Chris Rock, and forgotten comedians Schneider and Spade, to back him up. The ensemble casting definitely saves this movie. If it weren’t for the combined humor of all five comedic juggernauts, the underlying family themes and corny humor would have been unbearable.

3 Knocks out of 5

Alfred Hitchcock’s “Blackmail” (1929)

Every once in a while we have a moment of wonder about our favorite artists, filmmakers. It’s a thought that tends to lead us seeking an answer, it’s the curiosity of knowing and seeing the development of talent starting from the very beginning. Now, “Blackmail” (1929) may not be Alfred Hitchcock’s first motion picture, in fact there had been NINE (9) previous films under his belt. So why do we come back to “Blackmail” to note the start of a near-perfect career in cinema?

Blackmail Movie Poster 1929

Directed by: Alfred Hitchcock

Produced by: John Maxwell

Starring: Anny Ondra, John Longden

Running Time: 84 minutes

Plot

Alice White (Anny Ondra) plays a young woman, boyfriend to a Scotland Yard detective and daughter of a shop-keeper in early 1920’s London. Detective Frank Weber (John Longden), is far too obligated to his work to give Alice and their relationship the attention they both need. One evening, Frank takes Alice out on a date, however she also agrees to see another man unknown to Frank. Alice agrees to go back to this man’s studio flat later that evening in which he forces himself upon her. In a frightful attempt to save her life, she desperately kills the man with a large bread knife. Upon discovery of the body, investigations ensue and Frank is put in charge of the investigation. When Frank realizes Alice is the murderer, so too does another man…leading us to Blackmail.

When Hitchcock originally set out to direct “Blackmail” (first picture to be produced in Britain under BIP) his intention was to produce it silently. It wasn’t until a late screening of Al Jolson’s “The Jazz Singer” did he get the notion that his producers would inevitably require this to be a “talkie” picture. It wasn’t until the production was completed, or “wrapped” that John Maxwell had decided to schedule reshoots in order to be able to properly dub in bits of dialogue. Hitchcock, was disgusted with the thought of only a small part of the film having dialogue, had shot the entire picture with sound…as well as a silent version for the theatres not up to date with sound.

This film was critically acclaimed, considered to be among the first to pioneer the talkie picture in Britain and throughout Europe. Hitchcock had gone on to establish himself as one of the most prestigious filmmakers of the era. Establishing many of the “Hitchcock” trademarks we all know and love today (Blondes in distress, landmarks and off camera suspense). It’s these traits that we keep going back to in our quest to find the answer to why we see “Blackmail” as the true beginning of Hitchcock’s career in motion pictures.   It truly is the first picture to allow Hitchcock the ability to stretch his artistic wings and produce a film which not only captured the essence of the story but created an uneasy-feeling of suspense in which has made him famous.

For any Alfred Hitchcock fan this is a must see.

4.5 Knocks out of 5

 

Buy it here!